Chapter 1
Sponsoring Chaos 

The four major hypotheses expounding the origin of the moon are subjected to the absolutes of classical physics. The council’s sketch of a vagabond moon being captured by the earth’s gravitational tether is simplistic in the extreme. The fallacy is negated by the fact that the moon’s orbital gyrations are among the most complex in astronomy. The problematic promotion must yield to the 400/400 ratio of the moon/sun apparent diameter/distance. The moon calendar, called the libation calendar, relative to Imperial or Jerusalem time, is introduced. All dates in the Bible are calculated by the libation calendar.

Chapter 2 
Remarkable Assist 

The causation of twice-daily tides is on the agenda. While the premise may be stated in a matter-of-fact manner, the expose promises to be a white water adventure for those who wish to ride along with the investigation. On the agenda are: volcanism, pressure solids, differentiation of the moon/earth distances, and high and low tides. 

Chapter 3 
Daring Fantasies 

The Concord missions served as time capsules which transported man back in time to the beginning of the moon’s history. The untouched character of the regolith will come as a surprise to the many who have been swayed by erroneous reports attributing the topographical features of the moon to impacting meteorites. A familiar adage is applicable: NASA scientists could not see the trees for the forest. The dreamscape of catastrophic upheaval is wiped clean by the unimpeachable truths of classical physics. The expose is focused on: Ralph B. Baldwin’s theory, the absolute dating systems, and the origin of meteorites.

Chapter 4 
Filing Fiction Away 

The investigation deals with the mysterious cavities and the intrinsically associated domical bulges and dome excavations distributed across the near side of the moon. The sequence of events responsible is clarified by the inclusion of a simple, yet pertinent, experiment. The outlined premises, based on the dictates of classical physics, justify the disposition that the scientific record of creation, heretofore considered religious dogma by obstructionists and not worthy of scientific regard, remains intact as a responsible and verifiable truth; the evidence upholds the fact that the moon was formed within a 24-hour period only 6000 years ago. The conceptional errors of Baldwin are annulled by the bona fide truths presented by the investigation.

Chapter 5 
The Father of Light 

The manner in which the foundations of the earth and moon were laid set the precedent for the accretion of all other planets and moons. Studies of the scientific record of creation, linked with data realized by legitimate scientific inquiry based on classical physics, make it possible to answer the age-old question, What makes the sun shine? Note: Due to the length of the subject material, the investigation continues in Volume 4.

Chapter 6 
Profound Magic 

The controlled sentiment issued by the scientific council, duly labeled as profound magic, is opposed by the findings of classical physics. Subjects covered are: isotopes, slow neutrons, one atomic mass unit (AMU), splitting of the spectral line into the hyperfine structure, nuclides, half-life of radioactive samples, and the coincidental grouping of electrons and protons. 

Chapter 7 
Antiquated Beliefs

1.  Presents an expose on three so-called absolute dating systems: radiocarbon, uranium-thorium, and potassium-argon, which were developed in an attempt to verify the developing geological and evolutionary charts. When the old physics of cause and effect are applied, the term absolute turns out to be a scurrilous invective. Also tested are tree ring and radiocarbon dating. 

2. The dating systems are merely dominos set in a row, destined to crumble along with the quantum architecture of the atom. The persuasion brandished by obstructionists urging the populace not to trust in the scientific record of the earth’s accretion is wholly dependent upon: Avogadro’s law; the council’s faulty evaluation of radioisotopes, integrated mathematical incantations, and numerous other misconceptions and invalid assumptions. Biblical histories have the ring of truth.

---

Why do scientists and educators treat Avogadro's vanity as though it were an absolute, a law? It stands to reason that, if one researched the issue, a haunting question would arise: how did Avogadro, working without instrumentation, know there were exactly 6.02 astronillion molecules in a thimbleful of water? The answer is associative education. This is the fundamental belief that textbooks are vehicles of truth, the latter entrusted to responsible and dedicated teachers who faithfully teach said truths. To forward this goal, the innocents in their formidable years are instilled with the idealism that they should put their undying trust in any formulae derived from the studies of chemistry, physicists, mathematics, astronomy, etc. In essence, the innocents are persuaded to believe everything one gleams from a textbook; after all, this is the basis of modern education. The concept is ideal; unfortunately, however, truth often takes a back seat to quantum mischief.

The crux of the problem is that present-day members of the quantum league were once the innocents in the classroom and they, too, fell prey to Avogadro's whim. After years of assimilation, when an instructor either reads from a textbook or writes Avogadro's number on the blackboard, and states emphatically that there are exactly 602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules in a mol, the innocents accept the error without question, as does the instructor. What child or instructor is going to question an absolute, a fundamental law? Consequently, the child, like his/her instructor, accepts the SI mol without so much as a cursory glance; as a result, they grow up believing and teaching lies. The harsh reality is akin to a snake swallowing it's own tail; seemingly there is no end in sight.

To be sure, Avogadro's ruling was arbitrary as there is insufficient data to determine the exact number of molecules in a specific volume of gas. Before any numbers may be garnered, two principles must be applied. Firstly, the actual number of molecules in either a gaseous liquid, or solid sample, must be accurately assessed. The thought is quaint, if not altogether preposterous, in that a molecule refuses to stand in line to be counted. Secondly, if physicists were to miraculously determine the number of molecules in a specific volume—and it would require a miracle—a second principle would have to be applied before a standard could be established: the kinetic energy of gas. 

A reflection: Gaseous molecules are forever in erratic motion, both repelling and being repelled by other molecules while glancing off the walls of the container. Both temperature and pressure, as well as certain other key properties, are regulated by the kinetic energy of the gas. For instance, any increase or decrease in motion corresponds to a rise or fall of both temperature and pressure. In order to establish a standard, the kinetic energy of the several gases, along with an accurate count of molecules in a specific volume, would have to be realized. Neither has been accomplished; consequently, all numbers issued by the scientific counsel are pretentious at best.

Adding insult to injury, Avogadro inadvertently selected hydrogen as the standard by which all other gases were to be measured (inadvertent—"not duly observant or attentive"). Avogadro was inattentive; perhaps, due to oversight, in that hydrogen or, more apropos, hydroclusters are dispersed more rapidly than any other gas. Moreover, hydroclusters travel with the highest velocity at any given temperature, diffuse faster, and conduct heat faster than any other gas. The amazing hydrocluster accomplishes these feats while weighing in at the lowest molecular weight. If charges were automobiles, comparing hydrogen with any other element would be akin to comparing a Porsche 911 Carrera S to a Mustang GT. Both are sport cars, but viva la différence. Without undue comment, the eccentricity of hydroclusters relative to the proposed norm; especially, in its kinetic energy, cancels Avogadro's curious notion.