SAMPLE TEXT FROM CHAPTER 1

Note:  The text is taken out of context and refers to 
phenomena entertained in other sections.

At the outset, the purpose of the detour along the sensory track was to inform the reader as to why Darwin was so concerned by the “eye” and how it could have possibly developed through protracted graduation. In judging the issue, the inescapable conclusion is that Darwin was scientifically illiterate; he did not begin to comprehend the true heritage of the so-called eye, which is in fact the seat of perception, the most important aspect of physical man.

In reflecting on the cat and mouse game, Darwin issued the criteria by which the concept of protracted graduation was to be judged. Future discoveries in the all-inclusive fossil record had to yield numerous intermediate specimens which could be laid down in a gradual continuum so as to show the definitive development of the mind perceptors from their first appearance as tiny breaks in the bones of the skull to the development of full nests or, else, serious questions would be raised. The fossil record was considered “imperfect” at the time; this was the reason given as to why no intermediate specimens had been unearthed in Darwin’s era. Note: the disclaimer was basically an inclusion of sentiment, an action based on careful consideration, juxtaposed with emotion, and not necessarily a contrivance. The effect, especially relative to Darwin’s assertion of an “imperfect” fossil record, was ominous; for the proponents of graduation could now lean on the crutch of an imperfect fossil record to fend off intellectual reasoning countering the “theory.”

Balancing the issue, the all-inclusive fossil record (the standard by which the history of all living creatures, to include man, may be reckoned) has failed to produce a solitary intermediate specimen showing said graduation. Instead, the record reveals a marked continuum; all species appear to be as they were from the beginning. Great credence, based on the testimony of paleontologists throughout the world, may, therefore, be justly added to the scientific version of prototypes.

Prototypes, the male and female, were equipped with fully operational mind perceptors.

The imperfect fossil record of the Nineteenth Century, claimed by Darwin to be the reason why no physical evidence could be produced, may no longer be regarded as “imperfect;” relatively speaking, it is nearly 99 percent complete. With new finds trickling down in the last decades to an insignificant few, the resolution is well-founded. Predisposing the issue, paleontologists may no longer lean upon the embattled crutch of an imperfect record, wielding it as an antidote to forestall the truth. And biologists may no longer foster the unwarranted alliance between a photosensor and mind perception, which has endured to date by the vernacular of certain conjured up terms (as the third eye and eyespot) to fend off legitimate questions aimed squarely at the truth of the matter. The scientific council must stand on the physical record as must separatists; there can be no exception.

The all-inclusive fossil record, consisting of multiple thousands of specimens (in some instances thousands of specimens of the same species have been unearthed), covers the entire spectrum of both extinct and extant creatures. But, instead of the record of procreation being in chaos, as Darwin had hoped, with thousands of intermediate specimens showing the gradual development of mind perceptors, every fossil that has ever been unearthed shows a marked continuum. Again, all species appear to be as they were from the beginning. More emphatically, the oldest documented specimen of a surviving species is exactly like its living offspring today. It is as if all species were introduced into the environment completely formed, replete with fully functional mind perceptors sheltered within the confines of cone-like nests formed by the bones in the skull. In reiteration, this was the prerequisite for the survival of the species. The fossil record dictates that there had to have been a prototype, a fully developed male and his female, of each species that suddenly appeared upon the earth; all subsequent species of that genre were produced as a result of the union between those first male and female prototypes.

In an effort not to leave any stone unturned, the reader is advised to consider the following: while the investigation focused its attention on mind perception and the obvious lack of any intermediate specimens showing the strictly hypothetical protracted graduation of said mind perceptors, any one of a host of other criteria could have been substituted and the cause for concern would not have diminished. Again, the choice of mind perception was warranted by Darwin’s criterion that serious questions would arise if future discoveries in the fossil record did not definitively show the graduation of mind perceptors. An alternate possibility might have entertained the scientific council’s assertion that the whale (as the great blue whale) developed through protracted graduation, descending with modification from a base group of quadruped carnivores (“four-legged, meat-eating mammals”).

Procreant groups have charted the whale’s ancestral parents to be the base stock of either a species of the order Insectivora, not too unlike the Pantolestes, a family of furry, flesh-eating water mammals comparative in size to a small otter; or possibly, the Mesonychidae of the order Creodonta, an average sized flesh-eating mammal characterized by a large head. The Mesonychidae was inducted due to the significantly large heads of some species of whales; for instance, the head of a sperm whale constitutes nearly one half of its large bulk. Close relations of the Mesonychidae are charted to be the base stock of the ungulates, “mammals possessing hoofs.” On this basis, the familiar cow is a distant cousin of the great blue whale.

The premise of the whale’s heritage is not based on any physical evidence, as the unearthing of intermediate specimens in the fossil record showing said graduation, but by two assumptions: (1) the whale must have once lived on land due to its need to breathe air, and (2) the whale and the species of Insectivora or Mesonychidae share similar structural and internal features. The connotation is that animals with similar features must have developed, with adaptive modification, from a common ancestor. The conjectural reasoning is the basis and the indirect proof of protracted graduation.

The suggested link between the great whale and quadruped carnivores should be carefully weighed. Although the scientific council may regard the similarity of anatomical features as proof that both orders spawned from a common ancestor, separatists may well claim that, while there is, indeed, a marked heritage, it is necessarily so; for all creatures share a single designer: God.

20. And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

21. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

22. And God blessed them, saying, be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth

23. And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.—Genesis 1

A single designer warrants attention as it explains without undue analysis why multiple thousands of species share similar structural and internal features. For example, the skeletal structure of the whale’s flippers is anatomically comparative to the forelimbs of mammals. A single designer, once settled upon a meritorious design, would have employed said design, with modification, in a great number of diverse creatures that shared similar needs. If the structural design of the bones of the forelimb of a certain mammal was a meritorious achievement, facilitating the creature to flourish in its habitat, there would be no reason to purposefully alter the design in other creatures simply for the sake of change. More importantly, a single designer would explain that which biologists have been impotent in explaining: why the nearly four million different species of plant and animal life on the earth exist only as species which are inescapably characterized by (1) a distinct organic structure, (2) having like appearance, and (3) exchanging genetic material only with another of the same kind. This is the second law of procreation: all organic structures are not the same structures and organic structures of varying kinds cannot reproduce.

38....God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body.

39. All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.—1 Corinthians 15

Contrary to the doctrine of change expounded by the scientific council, stability is the principle that must be applied to all of procreation. This is dictated by the all-inclusive fossil record which clearly attests that all things appear to be as they were from the beginning. The oldest fossilized remains of the blue whale are exactly like those of living species; the first cattle are exactly like extant varieties; and, the first carnivores are exactly like their living offspring. There is no variance.

The estranged transformation of a quadruped carnivore of one distinct kind of flesh to an aquatic whale of a diverse type of flesh breaks the second law of procreation. The breach is sufficient to rule the premise invalid. The genetic code is fixed among the species; creatures of procreation cannot go about rearranging genetic codes at will, transmuting into creatures of a different flesh. Nevertheless, the investigation will entertain the belief of the scientific council for a proportional view. Please be aware that the following discourse is without scientific recourse; it merely represents obstructionist propaganda.

Although the whale is charted to have developed some 70 million years ago, its heritage goes further back still to a theoretical remote time called the Devonian Period (“age of the fishes”). During the period, the first early fishes learned to gasp oxygen through their gills, metabolizing oxygen through respiration. Amphibians were new in the graduating cycle, for they were at home both in and out of the water. The variants gradually lost their dependence on an aquatic life and ventured farther onto land, breathing air with gills similar to scorpions.

The first ruling reptiles are believed to have been small lizard-like creatures which was a remarkable advance from the amphibians that emerged from the sea over two hundred million years earlier. As more and more reptiles emerged, some took to the air while others grew into giant plant-eaters surmounting in size to many whales. Others stayed near the water and graduated into sea-like serpents. Still others graduated into terrifying killers that stalked the land in search of flesh. Many millions of years later, the warm-blooded quadruped carnivores, the base stock of the whale, emerged, completing the initial cycle of the whale’s heritage.

The sequence of events is divided into five distinct eras or periods of time. The Precambrian was an unknown, empty, vast span of millions of years when the earth began to take shape and cool down. The period following is known as the Cambrian and lasted over 100 million years; here, marine invertebrates and algae graduated into more advanced organisms. During the Paleozoic Era, life began to emerge from primeval seas as the first land plants and amphibians hugged the shores of ancient seas and ponds. The age of the dinosaurs bloomed during the Mesozoic or middle life era. The giant reptiles ruled the earth until their demise, ushering in the Cenozoic Era or recent life.

The theoretic genetic engineering accomplished by early fishes is unequaled in the annals of science; for, there was not one structural or internal part that was not either modified or, else, given up in it entirety. Fishes shed their scales for skin and developed forelimbs to replace the pectoral fins. The dorsal, anal, and pelvic fins were given up in favor of developing hind limbs. The caudal (tail) fin, used for propulsion, was replaced with a skin-covered tail. The gills closed up and lungs developed. The mind perceptors were modified so that distant objects would be in focus (fish see near objects clearly and accommodation is necessary for distant objects). And, in the process of transforming into quadruped carnivores— there is not sufficient space to list the thousands of changes—the fishes transmuted their type of flesh numerous times as they ascended the different orders. Finally, the conquest of land was realized; but, for a reason that remains a mystery, the base stock looked longingly back to the sea and the aquatic life of its distant cousins and began to revert back to an existence in water.

If the order Creodonta is considered the base, the large head slowly graduated into a telescoping, tapering beak. The nostrils on the tip of the snout began an arduous journey up to the top of the head, the nasal cavity pressing its way between the mind perceptors and the left- and right-hand sides of the brain in order to form blowholes. This must have been an arduous task, indeed, when consideration is given to the fact that the sensory tract fibers cross over in the chiasma. The crossover routes data transmitted from the left visual field to the right-hand side of the sensory perception region while data from the right visual field is transmitted to the left-hand side. The extraordinary journey, if it were a valid concept, would have spelled the doom of the venture as the nasal cavity severed the left visual apparatus and left-hand part of the brain from that of the right. The measure would have left the creature both blind and paralyzed. And, to state that the impairment was only temporary, as the sensory tract fibers were detoured around the blocking nasal cavity, is to forego the first law of procreation. To wit, mind perception is the prerequisite for the survival of the species. The investigation is justified, therefore, to declare that the blowholes did not develop as promoted.

Graduating further, the base stock transformed its body into a fusiform shape (“rounded and broad in the middle with tapering ends”). The bony tail developed into a powerful horizontal blade that, in lieu of hind limbs, was to be used for propulsion. The hind limbs were given up in the transmutation. The forelimbs degraded into flippers which served for maneuvering, balancing, and stopping. The dorsal fin, which was shed as the first fishes ventured onto dry land, reappeared. And the hair, which had replaced the scales in order to keep the creature warm while on dry land, was shed and replaced by insulating layers of fat.

The great blue whale quadrupled in size again and again until it reached a whopping 136,000 kilograms (150 short tons) in weight and attained a length of over 30 meters (100 feet), pushing aside all contenders to reign as the largest beast to have ever lived. The magnitude of the proposed transformation of the tiny quadruped carnivore into the great blue whale erased most every family characteristic except the need for the whale to breathe air. And upon the transformation of its organic structure, the process was near completion. Once back in its original aquatic habitat, the whale’s visual acuity, which had served it well on land, was impaired by the very essence of the sea, even though the water appeared to be quite clear.

The best effort to date showing how life made its jump from sea to land is a robotic salamander. The unit consists of nine plastic segments joined together, each activated by a microcontroller. The so-called salamander, on par with a child’s toy, lumbered down the beach and into the water of Lake Geneva. The project, reported in the journal Science 2007, was said to be “a demonstration of how robots can be used to test biological models…” An unscientific AOL poll asked members, “what do you think of the salamander robot?” Some 53% responded, “It’s lame.”

As evening approached, the impairment was compounded as a curtain of darkness shrouded the great beast, effectively limiting its mobility to daylight hours. Further complications persisted as the loss of visual acuity made it doubly hard to locate sufficient food in order to nourish its great bulk. If the whale were to gain complete freedom, both in mobility and foraging techniques, and in order to survive, the species would have to develop an acute sense of hearing to compensate for the loss of visual acuity: sound waves travel easier through water than the atmosphere.

As a countermeasure, the whale developed a system of echolocation (also called sonar) by which high frequency sound waves emitted by the beast travel through the murky water and are reflected back as echoes from underwater objects. The vibrations are picked up by massive shell-like bulla attached loosely to the skull, which were expressly fashioned for the purpose. The system, in its fullness, not only equipped the whale to track safely in the darkness of evening (as it could now detect objects in its way) but also heightened its ability to forage. The whale is sensitized to, and can read, different patterns of reflected echoes: it is able to detect a large aquatic creature or a massive group of tasty, shrimp-like krill, the main staple of some whales (as the baleen whale).

Another overachievement, meriting mentioning, is the ability of some species to dive to a depth of 250 fathoms (460 meters or 1500 feet) and remain up to an extended period of 40 minutes. The whale exercises the ability by panting its system full of oxygen. The red meat (muscle) of the beast contains a high quantity of myoglobin, similar to hemoglobin, which is responsible for transporting oxygen through the blood. The myoglobin is charged with rich oxygen during panting, thereby, delaying the oxygen debt. While submerged, the whale’s heartbeat is dramatically reduced while certain other muscles restrict the veins, causing oxygenated blood to flow slowly to body tissue and denying most of its great bulk the use of oxygen. The blood flow to the brain is not restricted so as to prevent the beast from falling into unconsciousness and drowning.

An interesting inherent trait is brought to light from the pages of history,

“even the sea monsters [whales] draw out the breast, and give suck to their young ones”—Lamentations 4:3. 

A mother whale is equipped with mammary glands which secrete rich milk. Unlike most mammals, from which the whale supposedly graduated, the calf does not suck. Instead, it places its mouth around the teats while the muscles around the mother’s mammary glands contract and force milk into its mouth. The mother whale is usually accompanied by a guardian whale (also “attendant” whale) which is conditioned to protect the helpless newborn. The guardian swims underneath the mother and calf, and, in the event of an attack by a killer whale or shark on the sibling, discharges a screen of bubbles to distract the predator and conceal its quarry.

Blowhole of an endangered blue whale, Balaenoptera musculus, the largest 
animal known to live on earth. The blowhole is opened by muscles upon surfacing.

The whale, making extensive use of echolocation in order to guide its massive fusiform body through the sea, is remotely comparative to the cigar-shaped advanced submarine which incorporates both sonar and radar in its guidance systems. The whale has two up on the submarine. For instance, the great blue whale, traveling at speeds of up to 15 knots (29 km, 17 miles) per hour, efficiently displaces water by its already streamlined body by making minute alterations in its skin; the adjustments prevent the contrary movement of eddies that would otherwise slow it down. A second example is the fact that a whale can travel vast oceans, revisiting feeding and breeding grounds time and again, without the aid of onboard computers linked up to an orbiting navigation satellite. The whale accomplishes the miracle of navigation by irradiation, “intellectual enlightenment.” More to the point, whales are compelled to travel at specific intervals to designated rendezvous points by divine intervention.

An example of irradiation occurred as a prelude to the worst tsunami in recent history. In December 2004, a tsunami was triggered by an earthquake in the Indian Ocean which sent devastating waves onto land causing widespread destruction. The death toll was over 225,000 people; 1.5 million people were left homeless. Although the Sri Lanka’s biggest wildlife reserve, Yala National Park, is home to hundreds of wild elephants and innumerable species of wildlife, not one animal carcass was found. Prior to the tsunami, the animals moved to higher ground, some only minutes before the flood ravaged the park. In one incident, chained elephants that had never disobeyed a command from their handlers, became agitated, snapped their chains, broke out of the compound, and headed for high ground, carrying several hapless Japanese tourists atop their backs to safety. The elephants and other animals were saved by the provincial hand of God which escorted them to safety.

The question some readers will ask is: If God imparted intellectual enlightenment to the animals and delivered them, why did He not warn the tens of thousands of humans who perished in the tsunami? The answer is man’s preoccupation with the things of this world, as it is written:

15. Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

16. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

17. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever. 1 John 2

Let not that person who is preoccupied with the things of this world, thus, refusing to retain the knowledge of God in his/her thoughts and deeds, expect anything from God. On the other hand, a righteous man is delivered from the things which are destined to come upon the earth. If the survivors of the tsunami were interviewed, many would testify that they were intellectually enlightened by either a vision or dream; some were spoken to audibly. An example of God’s intervention occurred as a missionary, who operated an orphanage in the path of the tsunami, saw the wave approaching and rushed toward the safety of his boat. The boat’s motor, which would not normally start on the first pull, miraculously roared into action and the missionary, his wife, and young charges sped away to safety.

Monarch butterflies, whales, salmon, wild geese, sea turtles, and numerous 
other species are guided to their destinations by irradiation.

Perhaps the most remarkable example of irradiation occurs each year as millions of monarch butterflies leave their breeding grounds in North America and migrate to a designated winter refuge in Mexico. An estimated 100 million may wait out the winter on 11 ridge tops in the central part of the country, clinging in colorful clumps to one species of fir tree. Monarchs in warmer parts of North America such as California, Texas, and Florida do not make the trip.

In the summer breeding grounds, the monarch’s mating cycle is 3–7 times; each new generation lives from 2–6 weeks. At the end of the cycle, the last butterflies to hatch are non-reproductive. It is these insects that fly some 80 km (50 miles) per day, migrating up to 2000 miles to the ancestral winter refuge. The interesting question is not how an insect less than 1 gram in weight can migrate thousands of miles, but how can an insect that has never visited the refuge make such a trip?

Again, only new individuals migrate to Mexico. The proponents of graduation insist that the gregarious monarchs and other migratory creatures, to include whales, salmon, wild geese, and sea turtles, are guided to their destinations by “instinct.” Instinct may be defined as “an inborn tendency that was acquired by base stock and transmitted from parents to offspring, a tendency which is a natural phenomenon guided by “nature.” The promotion incorporates the ballyhoo that monarchs either use the sun as a compass or are steered to their destination by a magnetic orientation. Dumb animals also have internal navigation systems—a memory compass of sorts—made up of special cells in the brain that are designed to fire when tripped by familiar landmarks, stars, smells, etc. The system is automatic in that dumb animals are unaware that it is operational; they know not where or why the compass is leading them, but follow the heading instinctively. The reader who is abreast of the investigation should not be confused by the connotation nature. In essence, migratory creatures are believed to be guided to their destinations (memory compass or otherwise) by an all-providing Mother Nature.

The postulations are irresponsible and devoid of any scientific reasoning. There remains, therefore, an association between the varying factions, obstructionists and separatists; for migratory creatures are, indeed, guided by irradiation; they are enlightened by divine intervention, either the occult deity Mother Nature, served by the pagan Greeks and Romans, or Jehovah God.

Returning to the origin of the whale, when only the facts are applied, an unbiased determination of the whale’s true heritage is possible. Foremost in importance, the all-inclusive fossil record, which remains the ultimate physical guide of all past life on the earth, has always been adverse to the concept of protracted graduation. If the whale had, in fact, progressed through the different orders as prescribed by the scientific council—fish, amphibian, lizard, quadruped carnivore, amphibian, and whale, cumulating (increasing) in size with each transformation of its organic structure, there should have been at least a partial record encapsulated within the earth’s crust. The purported trip of the nostrils from the tip of the snout to the top of the head, the telescoping of the large head, and the disappearing hind limbs would have presented hundreds, if not thousands, of intermediate specimens. Yet, not one intermediate specimen showing said transition has ever been discovered; this is a remarkable fact.

A dead humpback whale washed up near Big Sur, California. Cause of death is unknown. The fossilized remains of whales are plentiful. Without exception, each fossil is exactly like living whales; there is no variance.

The dismal failure of paleontologists to validate the claims of biologists may no longer be charged to an “imperfect” fossil record: the record is nearly 99 percent complete. Specimens of whales, in particular, are relatively plenteous and easy to locate. In one of the greater mysteries of procreation, whales often beach themselves; thus, the fossilized remains of the unfortunate creatures are strewn around the globe as grizzly reminders of the event. Without exception, every specimen that has ever been unearthed, representing a living member of the species—beaked, beluga, blue, gray, narwhal, right, sperm, and all other whales, is identical in every aspect to that of living offspring. There is no discernible difference. Stability, not variance, is the third law of procreation.

Following the dictates of the all-inclusive fossil record, the foregoing treatise, as espoused by obstructionists, may be labeled, in a word: fallacy. The suggested trip of the nostrils initially doomed the prospect. If the whale had developed as suggested, it would have become extinct long ago as the nasal cavity attempted to travel up the snout to form blowholes on the top of the head. Remember: The extensions of the forebrain crossover one another; the right memory perceptor is an extension of the left-hand portion of the brain, the left, an extension of the right. Hence, the trip of the nostrils to the top of the cranium would have severed the crossed-over sensory tract fibers, resulting in blindness and the great beast’s imminent death.

The seemingly unrestrained design of the great whale, like that of its miniature aquatic neighbor, the amoeba, reaffirms the beast as an individual entity, characterized by a distinct kind of flesh. It may be stated without reservation that the whale’s ancestral parents were neither the Insectivora nor the Mesonychidae, but whales. The physical guide conclusively shows that there was a prototype, a fully developed male and his female, of each species of whale that suddenly appeared upon the earth. Subsequent offspring of that genre resulted from the union between those first male and female prototypes. King David expressed well that which is recorded in both the fossil record and history. Taking license with the following scripture, suppose that the “small” beasts refer to the self-preserving little amoeba:

24. O Lord, how manifold are thy works! In wisdom hast thou made them all: the earth is full of thy riches.

25. So is this great and wide sea, wherein are things creeping innumerable, both small and great beasts.

26. There go the ships: there is that leviathan [whale], whom thou hast made to play therein.

27. These wait all upon thee; that thou mayest give them their meat [food] in due season.

28. That thou givest them they gather: thou openest thine hand, they are filled with good.

29. Thou hidest thy face, they are troubled: thou takest away their breath, they die, and return to their dust.

30. Thou sendest forth thy [Holy] spirit, they are created [i.e., in the womb or egg cell]: and thou renewest the face of the earth

31. The glory of the Lord shall endure for ever: the Lord shall rejoice in his works.— Psalm 104

The detour along the sensory tract (and the offshoot of the investigation into the heritage of the whale) was initiated, firstly, as a measure to correct numerous misconceptions, most of which may be traced to quantum abuse; and secondly, as a vehicle of understanding to point out the numerous difficulties underlying the impetus of Darwin’s proposal that dumb creatures designed the mechanisms of mind perception and went about developing said mechanisms through protracted graduation. The conclusion of the matter is definitive: paleontologists, going about to validate Darwin’s “theory,” have unwittingly served the interests of separatists. Again, the physical guide by which all past life on the earth may be accounted attests (“demonstrates the truth of ”) the historical version of prototypes. The laws of probability further attest the fact. Simply stated, the chance of finding an intermediate specimen showing the long-awaited first tiny break in the skull after 130 years of intense digging is zero. 

Northern Gannets. Prototypes, the male and female, were equipped with fully 
operational mind perceptors.

The biblical origin of prototypes equipped with the prerequisite for survival—mind perception— is compelling, especially, when laid beside the crippled “theory” of protracted graduation. It is all the more compelling when coupled with the intriguing concept of a single designer, which explains fully that which is otherwise inexplicable: why nearly four million species of plant and animal life exist only as distinct species, possessing unique organic structures, and exchanging genetic material only with like kinds. More relative, a single designer explains the miraculous apparatus of mind perception: (1) the transparent media—preaperture wash, light-admitting aperture, nutrient wash, tissular lens, and jellied body; (2) the utterly complicated neural arrangement encompassing hundreds of millions of complicated tissular parts—contrasts, color acceptors, blocking terminals, processor cells, collectors, etc.; and (3) the osmosis of several hundred thousand messages per second in the phenomena of color vision. Relative to the whale, a single designer indubitably explains not only the phenomenon of dumb creatures migrating great distances to a specified rendezvous spot—they are intellectually enlightened (irradiated) by divine intervention—but also the elaborate conditioning which allows the whale to flourish in its ecological niche, especially the inherent ability to track at night and forage for food by making extensive use of echolocation. The maternal interest toward offspring and dozens of other traits will not be listed for brevity’s sake.

The long-concealed fact that every creature seems to have been introduced into an already established ecosystem fully developed complements the scientific record. The simplicity of prototypes becomes even more alluring when the investigation takes issue with certain key phrases in the Bible that were improperly translated due to a lack of scientific knowledge. Exploring the many issues recorded in the Bible may be compared to a treasure hunt in that an intellectual challenge is manifested on most every page, but, once mastered, unequaled knowledge may be reaped. The forthcoming corrections, coupled with the sequential placement of a book in the Bible which is currently out of place, promises to be a rewarding venture; for, the dinosaurs, the purpose of the investigation, will thunder to life out of the pages of recorded history.